📡 Elevate Your Signal Game with Unmatched Clarity!
The onelinkmore 15-Meter Low Loss RG58 N Male to SMA Male Antenna RF Coaxial Cable is designed for superior performance in various applications, featuring a durable waterproof PVC jacket, pure copper construction, and versatile connectivity options. Ideal for two-way radios, antennas, and Wi-Fi signal boosters, this cable ensures minimal signal loss and reliable connections.
| Number of Items | 1 |
| Item Weight | 17.64 Ounces |
| Unit Count | 1 Count |
| Shape | Round |
| Color | Black |
| Indoor Outdoor Usage | Outdoor, Indoor |
| Recommended Uses For Product | Cable to connect outdoor antenna or remote antenna to indoor amplifier |
| Frequency | 6 GHz |
| Data Transfer Rate | 15 Megabits Per Second |
| Number of Pins | 4 |
| Wattage | 1 KW |
| Connectivity Technology | Coaxial |
| Additional Features | SMA to N Antenna Cable |
| Compatible Phone Models | Attributes do not apply to goods |
| Connector Gender | Male-to-Male |
| Connector Type Used on Cable | Sma to N Adapter |
| Cable Type | N to SMA RG58 Coax Cable |
| Compatible Devices | Use to connect SMA radio sources such as modem, routers, WiFi Signal Booster Repeater, etc. to the female N connector found on many external fixed mount antennas |
| Outer Material | Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) |
E**S
bien emballé
arrivé à temps et et les adapters étaient parfais pour le modem et l'antenne.
D**N
Excelente
Excelente
R**L
Buen producto
Excelente producto
P**R
Seems a little lossy
Seems a little lossy, but I don't have a way of sweeping it.Still in a coil when I connected it, so I suspect that may be why I saw loss receiving at 700mhz
R**T
Good coax.
I am running this coax on an ADS-B receiver. So there is not a lot to know about it. There seems to be good signal retention, although I haven't put any sort of testing equipment on it. The coax appears to be of good quality construction yes is flexible enough to route the cable around as needed in a base station installation. I would buy again for this application.I did not rate the tech support because I didn't need to use tech support.
Trustpilot
4 days ago
5 days ago
