Easy@Home Single Drug Screen Test (Cannabinoids Urine Test) - THC Tests for Home THC Drug Test Urine Detox Kit Cutoff Level 50ng/mL Individually Wrapped - EDTH-114 (50 Pack)

I bought these just in case for a job that might test for THC, but ended up landing one that doesn’t care—lucky me. Still, I did try a few of the tests out of curiosity and they worked flawlessly. Super easy to use, clear results, and very fast. For the price, this 20-pack is a solid backup plan for anyone needing peace of mind. Definitely recommend!

Very impressed with these! Easy to use and accurate.

The product is legit and it does work correctly. The test was only used to detect marijuana. It was not used for any other drug.

I can say all the reviews here about these tests being closer to the 20-15ng cutoff are correct , which isn't really a bad thing . Without too long of a review I tested with 2 other tests , so 3 different brands one test showed results from 100 , 50 and 20 ngs . 2 of the tests showed a darker negative @50ng/ml , these easy@ hometests ALWAYS show a very faint ghost line @ 50ng ( sometimes a little darker if I have a few cups of coffee before the test , meaning slightly diluted but nothing that would cause a concern with an actual lab test ) The tests with 3 levels showed dark lines @ 100 and 50ng/ml and a ghost line @ 20ng/ml ( which means im close to passing a lab test by their standards , which should be the case after 35 days abstinence ) So my conclusion is these are highly sensitive tests and if you are seeing the dreaded ghost line , you are " probably" good to go @ 50ng and your're probably closer to the 20 ng level . PS for those of you using palo azul , all you are doing is diluting your urine , you can get the same effect with water, creatinine( eat steak for a few days before the test if you dont have suppliments) and b12, but palo azul is good for you regardless as an anti inflamatory and other liver health benefits , THC is highly lipid soluable but unlike most of the metabolites in pills the metabolites you release from THC are mostly excreted through feces like 75% worth, urine is the other 25%, so liver flushes mean nothing , fiber is more important and can help better . Hope this helps .

good qualityaccurategood pricefast test resultseasy to do

Exact results.

I think these are accurate but you have to follow the directions... you can't just urinate on the whole stick and expect accurate results, you can't just let it sit forever then read it. You have to dip it into a cup and make sure its not submerged passed the line on the tip, and then read it within the indicated time frame... not following these directions made my results vary, sometimes it would say I was hot and sometimes it would say I wasn't under the same conditions / day, then I got consistent readings after following the directions.

After seeing wildly variable testing results with several different THC testing products, we decided to do a little research. This product in particular has reviews that claim both false negatives AND false positives. The false positives seem to be more recent. This product's reviews also included reports of valid tests using tap water. This product was tested each day (along with 3 other hand held assay products from other brands) from 3 days after last use to 2 weeks after last use in three user groups. This product's information materials state that the cutoff for a positive test is 50ng. However, we conclude that the cutoff is likely far lower than 50ng. We tested the urine of individuals with NO THC use; an "occasional" user (defined as 1-2 doses in 1-2 consecutive days per week with no fewer than 4 days and no more than 6 days from one use period to the next to simulate an occasional weekend user who has a use history of 3-6 months in this pattern; ∆8 and ∆10 only) with the last use occurring 3 days prior to first testing; and a daily ∆8 and ∆10 user. The daily user showed positive on all tests each day within the 14 day testing cycle (days 3 through 17 as from last use) as expected. The non user was negative on all test products on all test days as expected. However, the "weekend user" was still positive on day 17 after last use with THIS test product. The same weekend user urine was negative with all other test products on day 7 and beyond after last use. All products advertised the same cutoff value of 50ng. We went further and diluted the weekend user's urine collected 8 days and 10 days since last use that showed positive on this product. This urine was diluted with plain tap water (1:.75 for each diluted test). In both diluted tests, this product produced a valid weak negative (a vertly faint but visible test line, and a somewhat faint control line). All urine samples were gathered from sufficiently hydrated individuals (urine was light yellow in color) with all samples collected at approximately the same time each test day.This product appears to highly sensitive to THC metabolites. Therefore product is not accurate according to the advertised cutoff value and confidence percentages in the package insert. This test is unreliable in that an otherwise presumptive positive sample could be diluted with normal tap water to produce a negative test line yet still show a "valid" control line resulting in a presumptive negative test.