---
product_id: 42739271
title: "UFOs: Reframing the Debate"
brand: "robbie graham"
price: "AR$108628"
currency: ARS
in_stock: true
reviews_count: 8
url: https://www.desertcart.com.ar/products/42739271-ufos-reframing-the-debate
store_origin: AR
region: Argentina
---

# UFOs: Reframing the Debate

**Brand:** robbie graham
**Price:** AR$108628
**Availability:** ✅ In Stock

## Quick Answers

- **What is this?** UFOs: Reframing the Debate by robbie graham
- **How much does it cost?** AR$108628 with free shipping
- **Is it available?** Yes, in stock and ready to ship
- **Where can I buy it?** [www.desertcart.com.ar](https://www.desertcart.com.ar/products/42739271-ufos-reframing-the-debate)

## Best For

- robbie graham enthusiasts

## Why This Product

- Trusted robbie graham brand quality
- Free international shipping included
- Worldwide delivery with tracking
- 15-day hassle-free returns

## Description

Full description not available

## Images

![UFOs: Reframing the Debate - Image 1](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51PXU4qPvPL.jpg)
![UFOs: Reframing the Debate - Image 2](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51rTGkajRBL.jpg)

## Customer Reviews

### ⭐⭐⭐ 







  
  
    A Mixed Bag
  

*by V***Y on Reviewed in the United States on April 28, 2021*

I bought this e-book because I saw Jack Brewer had an essay in it, and I read his blog.  I think he's one of the most level-headed voices on the subject of UFOs and high strangeness.  His essay did not disappoint!  I would recommend this book for that alone.My problem with most of the other essays was not "closed-mindedness", as is implied by some, but the dismissal of actual science - particularly in the areas of cognition, memory, perception, and neuroscience.  Yes, experts like Dr.  Elizabeth Loftus is mentioned, in one sentence, and there are a few sentences devoted to Dr. Michael Persinger's work involving electromagnetic fields and the temporal lobes, but...When OBEs are mentioned as if they are a fact, and Persinger's work left unexplained except to say "many people don't accept his work", red flags go up for me.  His work can be replicated - no one has to "accept" it. There is no such standard of "proof" for OBEs, remote viewing, etc. There is no evidence those things are replicable under rigorous conditions.Additionally,  when I see the word "scientism", I know I'm going to be annoyed. That word is a pejorative that equates science with belief. The truly scientific mind doesn't work that way. Science is not belief or religion.Also, there are statements regarding memory and perception indicating we don't know how they work. Having spent my time at university getting a master's degree in cognitive psychology, I can confidently state that we most certainly do have some idea how the brain works.  We can even create AI models to illustrate this. And experiments can be replicated and published in peer-reviewed journals.  It is intellectually dishonest to state that it's a big mystery and that anybody's idea is just as valid as anyone else's.I don't discount the consciousness angle of UFOs - I am a big fan of Jacques Vallee. But I do object to the idea that there is no reality, that all consciousness resides outside the brain (some might, but not all), that "contact" via drugs or meditation is as "real" as encountering someone in the flesh (though it might seem that way to the contactee). If no one knows what's real,then that leads to a dead-end and does nothing to advance knowledge.Also, using theoretical physics to promote what is indeed "woo" is a bs attempt to appear intellectually superior to regular folks, and that leads to exploitation and elitism - which do not advance knowledge, either, but certainly contribute to the "enlightened ones'" bank accounts.There are other points that I take issue with, but this review is already too long. The final thing I'll say is, as a therapist (yes, I worked in experimental and clinical settings), the treatment that UFO experiencers receive at the hands of investigators is truly harmful and exploitive. On that, I can agree with most of the authors.I recommend this book, but be wary of the post-modernist intellectual dishonesty in some of the articles.

### ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 







  
  
    A Ufology "Must-Read"
  

*by R***E on Reviewed in the United States on June 13, 2017*

There is a disturbance in the ufology force, and it is a book titled, UFOs: Reframing the Debate. Edited by Robbie Graham, this anthology brings together pieces by 14 different authors who each bring a unique and cutting-edge perspective to a field which of late seems to have lost its way, with many researchers zealously fixated on the ETH (Extraterrestrial Hypothesis) and focusing their efforts exclusively on nuts-and-bolts explanations.As Diana Walsh Pasulka points out in the foreword, “leaving behind the ‘nuts-and-bolts’ approach and embracing the complexity of how the phenomenon affects and shapes belief frees researchers and allows them to gain a broader view of the mechanisms of the phenomenon.” That is the case with the 14 authors included here, who expose the reader to everything from personal experiences to thought experiments in an effort to understand -- not make conclusions -- about what is going on with UFO contact events.After Dr. Pasulka’s cogent foreword, editor Graham -- no stranger to ufology -- presents an introduction framing the anthology and providing a concise summary of each author’s contribution. A brief biography of each author is included at the end. One of the extremely valuable features of the book are the extensive and relevant citations within the entries as well as in the endnotes. One could follow this path of literary breadcrumbs and easily go down a ufology reading rabbit-hole for months if not years.There’s something here for veteran ufology fans and researchers as well as for beginners, but a word of caution is in order: there is some tough going here. The authors do assume a certain amount of prior knowledge, plus they are not afraid to challenge longstanding beliefs and perspectives. There are times when readers will be tempted to put the book aside because an author’s perspective is so out of alignment with their own, but as Graham advises, “Don’t do that.” There is a great pay-off for thoughtful persistence through each of the entries.In this wide-ranging and brilliant collection regarding the current state of ufology, the reader can expect to learn about parapsychology, the role of belief, parasociology, cultural influences, religious connotations, high strangeness aspects, a new classification system, the back story of the Roswell Slides debunking, co-creation, anarchist subversion, trauma analogies, the importance of empathy, and more.What does all of that have to do with ufology? Get a copy of the book and find out. You won’t be sorry.

### ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 







  
  
    We Need More Books Like This!
  

*by K***R on Reviewed in the United States on August 12, 2018*

This book presents a collection of essays, and authors, whose theories should be at the forefront of the UFO debate. The ETH (ExtraTerrestrial Hypothesis), though an entertaining belief is in reality mostly untenable.I follow the authors that are on social media. Greg Bishop and Susan Demeter St Clair as well as a few of the others are my favorites.Well written and evenly balanced between belief and a demand for evidence, this is an excellent book.

---

## Why Shop on Desertcart?

- 🛒 **Trusted by 1.3+ Million Shoppers** — Serving international shoppers since 2016
- 🌍 **Shop Globally** — Access 737+ million products across 21 categories
- 💰 **No Hidden Fees** — All customs, duties, and taxes included in the price
- 🔄 **15-Day Free Returns** — Hassle-free returns (30 days for PRO members)
- 🔒 **Secure Payments** — Trusted payment options with buyer protection
- ⭐ **TrustPilot Rated 4.5/5** — Based on 8,000+ happy customer reviews

**Shop now:** [https://www.desertcart.com.ar/products/42739271-ufos-reframing-the-debate](https://www.desertcart.com.ar/products/42739271-ufos-reframing-the-debate)

---

*Product available on Desertcart Argentina*
*Store origin: AR*
*Last updated: 2026-03-16*