Full description not available
B**S
Really nice!
I bought these because I needed some more nice clothes for work and I dig the retro look--plus, they were on sale for $15, so how can you go wrong? It turns out they were a real score! They fit nicely: normally I order 30-30's but Amazon recommended 30-32's and that was right on the ball. they are a tad long, but that's fine for dress pants and 30-30's would have definitely been too short. They are an attractive dark olive-tinged forest green color that gives them a nice retro 30's/40's or early 60's look. They have 1" cuffs and have an elastic waistband. The elastic is firm and cleverly hidden so you would never know just from looking at them--no stretchy elastics or wrinkles visible. Very comfortable and warm for fall-winter-spring. Definitely not for summer, though. The legs are narrow, which is the look now and also works for a 1800's or 1960's look. They fit a 1 1/2" belt but probably work better with a 1" belt. They are 50-50 wool/poly blend. It feels like wool and isn't scratchy. The only hassle with them is that they are dry-clean only, which is normal for wool so I don't consider that a disadvantage to them. I was so impressed that after a few days to try them out, I ordered a second pair in a different color at the regular price, which I still consider a bargain.
P**5
Great pants
These pants are very good value for the money. I ordered my usual size (34-32) and lo and behold, they fit perfectly. Be advised, they are a bit narrower in the leg than I expected and they are also not cuffed like the picture shows. I'm happy with the purchase.
A**R
MC Hammer “Can’t Touch This” Pants epic fail
Would give it less than one star if possible.It's interesting reading the reviews on this item. Maybe it's due to a lack of fashion sense or not dressing up often, but as someone who wears suits regularly and needs to look sharp for work, here's my honest take.The quality is subpar—certainly not even close to tweed, and the material is ridiculously thin. I ordered a size 36x32, which is my usual go to when ordering off line but I am 34x30 size for slim-fit pants. I like my pants more form-fitting, especially around the legs, as many American styles tend to be too baggy. Unfortunately, these are a perfect example of overly loose, "baggy" pants. Honestly, the way they fit kind of reminds me of the baggy pants from the '90s, like something MC Hammer would wear during his "Can't Touch This" days.While they might seem affordable at first glance, they are definitely not worth the money. They run large and the fit is uncomfortable. Save your money.
1**8
No Pleats.
The item description state that the slacks have pleats and cuffs. They did come with 1 1/4 inch cuffs but I did not see any pleats. The quality of the slacks and the fit was perfect so I am overlooking that and keeping them. I ordered the whole set of colors and maybe the other ones will actually show the pleats..
I**K
Yep
I wear a 30x32 usually, my waist is really <29in but that's the best overall size for me. These (size 30s) fit as well as I could have hoped for, I was worried they would be too big on the waist or too short on the legs but neither is true. They fit my waist better than most 30x32s as they are more trim in that area, and there is length to spare despite being a taller guy. I'm impressed with the build, they don't feel cheaply made to me given the price point. The patterning is nice, they look great and fit me like a tailored fit, but I will say they are definitely slimmer; I prefer slim fit, but be warned they can be tight around the thighs when you sit down even if you're a trimmer guy. 50% wool too, great value here IMO.
S**H
Looks nice, feels fake
Nice looking pants, but the lining is synthetic, not comfortable. When I searched for "100% wool", I was not expecting to find a blend that was mostly plastic.
L**R
Fancy Pants
super comfortable and well made, be aware they are dry-clean only but so worth it!
Q**T
Good pants
Great fit
Trustpilot
Hace 2 meses
Hace 1 mes