Mens Micro G Strikefast MidCross Trainer

These are light weight, fit well, and are very comfortable for all day walking. They're also made well and very durable. Not much arch support, but I added my own insoles and that just upgraded these shoes even further. I like that they're mids/high tops so my work pants fit nicely over them without bunching up. I like that they have a tough tactical look to them too.

Awesome boots, really comfortable and light.

I am an SRO and I do alot of walking. These boots feel like shoes and are really comfy. I would highly recommend. And their were under $100, can't beat the price.

I work outside & it seems to be holding up well & is comfortable. Fit is normal. Style is good in my opinion

I’ve been using the Under Armour Men’s Micro G Strikefast Tactical Shoes for general hiking and trips to the gun range, and they’re a solid pick for both. On hikes, the lightweight synthetic upper (weighing about 10.2 oz per shoe) keeps my feet cool and comfortable, even on warm days, while the abrasion-resistant PU coating holds up against rocky trails and brush. The Micro G foam midsole and EVA footbed offer decent cushioning for moderate 5-10 mile hikes, absorbing impact on uneven terrain. At the range, the slip-resistant rubber lug outsole provides excellent grip on gravel or slick indoor floors, which is great when moving between shooting stations or standing for long periods. The pull loops make them quick to slip on, and the low-profile design doesn’t scream “tactical,” blending well for casual use.That said, they have limitations. For hiking, the narrow fit—mentioned in some reviews—can feel restrictive if you’ve got wider feet or wear thicker socks, and they lack the ankle support needed for rugged, multi-day treks. At the range, they’re great for stability, but the non-waterproof material is a hassle if you’re out in wet conditions, as I learned during a rainy session when my feet got soaked. Battery life isn’t a concern here, but the cushioning starts to feel thin after hours of standing, especially on concrete range floors. For $80-$100, they’re a versatile option for light hiking and range days, but for tougher trails or wet environments, you might want something like the Under Armour Valsetz for better durability and fit.

Honestly these feel like a pair of Jordans, but lighterAround the ankles, I like these more, so I'll give it 5 stars.

I have purchased my last pair of Under Armour work boots. I have used, either this shoe or this style of shoe by Under Amour for around 10 years now. They were extremely comfortable for standing and walking on concrete and durable for around a year of consistent use. The last two pairs I’ve purchased were much more expensive and of significantly lower quality the my past pairs. I’ve been wearing this most recent pair for about 3 weeks and I had to purchase insoles to be able to walk in them. Sorry Under Armour, you’re cutting corners and raising costs at the expense of my business. The deep cushion is about 1/16” thick, any wonder why my feet hurt so bad now?

First time wearing these shoes they felt GREAT, they are light weight, true to size, and are comfortable initially. However as the day progressed the right shoe started bothering me around the arch of the foot and kept bothering all the way upto the end of the work day. I made an exchange, got the new pair and am wearing them at work, the right side feels better, better than the first pair, however that right side is slightly uncomfortable. I DON'T KNOW WHY it's only the right side!? This has never happened with any other shoe. I'll keep the second pair because they are better than the first pair and it's only slightly uncomfortable and I can deal with it as it's only two days a week I'll wear these, but doesn't make sense. The left side feels great with no issues. No way I got a bad pair twice in a row right.