RAD Cycle EZConnect Foldable Bike Rack Bicycle Storage Floor Stand Connect More to Make Multi-Bike Stand

Supports my somewhat heavy 20-in custom e bike, the stand is Rock solid!!! 🤘

Light, portable, work with a huge variety of tires. I don’t have a fat tire mountain bike, but these might be too small for any tire approaching 3” in width. Otherwise, I can’t say a single bad thing about these. I purchase three on a sale, and wish I had a couple more.

great bike stand. SAME quality/size as name brands at 1/3 the cost. I purchased 2.

The RAD design is almost identical to the Rakk stand; I assume the patent expired. I own four Rakks and bought all new for under $25 each. They are now $52 and are never discounted. Rakk does make a better stand but not for a $30 premium.Here are the differences:1. The spring clip lock pin is the same design but the pin is shorter and barely locks the arm in the upright position. The spring is a bit weaker, too. It’s doesn’t seem to jiggle free in any case so it works as long as there isn’t too much side play with the arm (see my later comments).2. The rubber feet are made from a slightly harder material and not glued in place. They work fine otherwise. They don’t slip off. You can always use some glue if you wish.3. The brackets that attach to the feet for connecting multiple stands are made from thinner sheet metal and need to be squashed so they don’t swing freely if not used. Or just remove them if they are not needed. They don’t affect function.4. The plastic roller that grips the tire is held in place with a bolt and nut with a spacer like the Rakk. The Rakk version has a nylon locking nut, however, that does a better job holding the tolerance to allow the pieces to roll without excessive play. I adjusted the RAD nut and it’s fine but might come loose over time.5. The spring-loaded arm has a weaker spring and the bolt-axle arrangement that attaches the arm to the stand base doesn’t adjust as well as the Rakk. I tightened the axle to the point where the arm wouldn’t spring back then backed it off until it did. That removed the excessive side play with the arm others have reported here.Hope this helps. Overall, if you use this daily, it may not remain “tight” like the Rakk but you decide if that’s worth another $30. In my case, this is for a bike that will not be used much.

I bought this on sale for $17 and this stand works just fine for my mountain bike with 29 inch tires. A bit wobbly so I have to be careful but holds steady once the wobbling settles down.

Solid and relaibleI find the stand sometimes moves if I try to roll the rear wheel in. If I slightly lift the wheel first it does not moveI find its much easier (not that its hard with the rear wheel) going front wheel in. I kind of naturaly lift the front end when I put it in the standOnce in the bike is secure. My heaviest bike is 25 lbs with 42mm tires and its fine in there. Its primarily used for my wifes XS Canyon Roadlite with 650Bx30

The good: came pre assembled, folds to minimize workspace, connects to multiple stands (although I did not test this)The bad: I have a bike with true 2.4” tires and they are too wide to fit the rack’s bottom and arm’s tire touch points, making the stand unusable as the bike is not stable in the stand. The other problem is that when I fit a bike with tires that are slightly less wide (eg 2.3”), the sidewalls tend to catch the sides, causing the stand to rotate with the tire while attempting to remove the bike from the stand. The width of the stand’s feet don’t offer a stable enough base, unless you run smaller/thinner tires.Overall: this rack probably works fine for tires 2.2” or less

Excellent product and design. However, the frame could not accommodate my Giant FS with Maxxis 29x2.5WT tires. The 2.4 inch limit is indeed the maximum width the rack will hold.