PolarGrit X, Rugged Multisport GPS Smart Watch, Ultra-Long Battery Life, Wrist-based Heart Rate, Military-Level Durability, Sleep and Recovery, Navigation, Trail Running, Mountain Biking

I don't normally write reviews on products, but I thought I would for this product due to having very limited experience with sports watches with this being my first one.Pros:Simplicity: its a very easy to navigate watch, with no added extras. Its basically a sports watched stripped back from all the smart watch options. It simply is just a tracking sports watch with no fancy bells or whistles, this is definitely a pro for me as I dont need all of the extra stuff another watch may give you.Reliability: Not to Jinx it, but so far, I have seen the reliability in this watch. It has given me good readings not only on GPS distances but also reliable / believable heart rates. Occasionally it reads a bit high, as when I am resting I have seen it in the 90s, but maybe I am just unfit.The sleep tracking also seems pretty reliable and gives plenty of information and breakdowns on your sleep cycles and patterns, also how many times you were woken in your sleep.Rugged styling: This is the Grit X which is targeted towards the outdoor sports world. It is waterproof, you can run in the rain with it. It will survive being knocked around a bit.App: The polar flow app is very VERY detailed and breaks down multiple readings and stats about your day. I find it easy to understand but potentially a bit overwhelming as there is a lot of information on there.Cons:HR occasionally showing high: Like I said before, Maybe I am just unfit.Not amazingly comfortable for all day use: The watch can make your wrist itchy, but its an easy fix, take the watch off for a while, wipe the back of it, sorted.Manually tell it you are awake: One thing that some people may find annoying regarding sleep tracking, when you are awake, it does not automatically recognise you are awake, and asks you to confirm this. It is literally just one click on the red ringed button to tell it you are awake, so not to much of an issue.Overall: This is a solid watch for any sports enthusiast. It's definitely not on the level of the Garmin Fenix but isn't trying to be, do don't be disappointed. If you want a reliable watch to keep on your wrist day in and day out which will track all of your stats reliably and show it in an easy to break down formula, then this is the watch for you. If you arent 100% sure, then shop around a bit. Coming from me, this is a solid reliable choice not to be easily dismissed.

I have always been a Polar user but did look around this time because there are plenty of good quality Sports watches out there for this price. I had the M430 previously and looked at many comparison sites regarding the Grit X. It's still pretty new and there's not a lot of reviews out there but based on what I read and saw I took the leap.Love this watch. It by far the best Polar watch I have had. The Heart Rate tracks in line with my M430 and the additional features all add to my current weekly activity really well (160k bike rides (Road and Mountain), walks and a weekly run - which I hope to build on). In particular the watch weight really makes a difference - I have never been able to keep a watch on through the night and therefore not ever tracked sleep. I hardly know I have the Grit on it is that light and comfortable.The charge is good - so far I have had three days of around 12 GPS tracking activities (around 10 hrs) and it is at 50%.I would highly recommend and really pleased I kept the faith and carried on using what is such a responsive, easy to use, robust and stylish brand. I would also like to say that I had an issue setting up the weather tracker and through using the website via messenger the tech support took 10 minutes to guide me through the process. Very impressive.

Chose this after a lot of research when my trusty Garmin 235 finally reached the end of the line.Battery life is superb. I charge maybe once every week to ten days, and average 40-50km running every week.The display is good and very clearly visible in daylight. Response time to a raised wrist in starting the display can be a bit slow.Build quality is good. It feels solid. The strap is lovely and has plenty of adjustment. Starting and stopping needs a good shove on the buttons meaning accidentally pressing is a thing of the past. But it can make an accurate start/finish a little bit tricky.I like the idea of the ascent/descent hill split feature although in use it’s a bit patchy and inconsistent.Menus and screens easy to navigate with positive feedback from the buttons, and a useful hybrid touchscreen. Some data a bit hard to read on the go as needs to be scrolled up and down.The app is great. Huge amounts of info. Easy and fast to sync with phone compared to Garmin. Very fast transfer to Strava. No need to pay Strava upgrade costs as you get all the info you could need with the Polar app.The instructions are a bit hit and miss and if you’re used to Garmin the watch takes a bit of getting used to. Also, if you’re looking for more of a smartwatch, give this a miss. It’s a focused sport watch.Aside from a few niggles, this is a decent product and worth a look even if you’re a Garmin-phile.

Superior quality, amazing watch

I'm a watch person, I've seen and own a few so I'm not easily impressed but this is an amazing watch. I've replaced the band to a silicone with more grip.

After 3 months of purchase, i can say this sport watch is changing my life for the better, it does everything it is advertised for pretty well, if you are new to Polar expect maybe a learning curve, but afterwards you will see all the health benefits that it can bring to your life,

PORQUE LOS COLORES EN LA PANTALLA SON TAN OPACOS Y EN LA PUBLICIDAD SON TAN BRILLANTES ?

TLDR: if you can get it under $450, nowadays is still a good watch for the price. I would like to give it 4.5 stars as it is close from 5 stars than it is from 4 stars for that price, but Amazon doesn't include that option.I've been using this watch for a couple of months now, and while I had some problems at the beginning, after a factory reset the watch has been behaving very well. It certainly doesn't have the latest and greatest tech such as dual-band GPS or maps for context when you're following a route, but to be honest these are things I don't really Its accuracy is very good for a single band GPS (I usually set it to use GPS and GLONASS as I do MTB every weekend) and I've found that sometimes it even returned better accuracy than my Wahoo ELEMNT ROAM, which has dual-band GPS. I remember once I had a bug in the ROAM where the route was not loading in the computer, I used the navigation from the watch and it was very usable. Sure it was less convenient for the watch position and the sport, but it can get you out of a pinch and the compass is accurate enough to even track MTB in the trails.That being said, a very noticeable thing for me as soon as I got it from the box was the weight: maybe I was spoiled from my previous watch which was very lightweight, a Polar Vantage M2, but the quality of the materials and the extra components are immediately noticeable as soon as you pick it. In your wrist, you get used to it after a few days of wearing it, however, you need to be more careful when tightening the strap when you sleep, as it can produce inaccurate readings, or even detect long periods of time as 'unrecognized' if you press your watch against your body, as the weight will make it slide and lose contact with your skin.When it comes to sports, despite you can get used to the watch weight, you can certainly feel it when you are making any bouncy sport, such as mountain biking, and you need to set it very tight to avoid the bouncing to affect the heart rate readings much. Whereas the strap itself is comfortable (more on that later) a tight watch may be uncomfortable no matter what, in my case I use an external heart rate sensor, so I can set the watch a little loose and still get accurate data; you will still feel the watch bouncing, but it won't hurt your wrist, your mileage may vary on that end.The strap is from FKM rubber and whereas I had the impression of being bulky in the videos, it is very sleek and probably the most comfortable strap I've tried, it is very breathable, and it dries very quickly. I like it and I would probably switch it just for style or color matching for some occasions. When it comes to durability, the watch has proven to be very durable, I've had a couple of crashes in my MTB with zero damage to the watch, I've hit the bezel once against a metal gate and the one who got the pain chipped was the gate lol, and I've been using it both outdoors doing MTB every weekend and in the gym without any physical marks either on the watch or the screen so far. Time will tell as two months it too little to judge, but it seems promising.Many people have commented about the screen brightness, but I've had no issues whatsoever either using it indoors or outdoors with the brightness set at low. It is dimmer than other mineral crystal displays, but that is a sapphire thing, and it is present in any sapphire crystal display in any watch. That aside, when I'm doing MTB and considering my handlebar is wide sometimes I don't even need to flick the wrist, sometimes I can get the HR by just glancing at it. In the gym I've noticed under the right lighting conditions the screen is not visible from an angle, but just moving your wrist a little makes it readable again and so far I don't find it annoying as I prefer that and having peace of mind with my screen not breaking easily or scratching at all, as I had to replace the screen protector in my previous watch every few months.I train between 8 and 12 hours a week in average, recording no GPS activities from Monday to Friday mainly being 45 minutes cardio sessions 5 times a week and three strength training sessions between 1 and 1.5 hours each and a long MTB ride on weekends for about 8 hours. With that usage I use to get between 5 and 6 days of battery life. It is not the most everlasting battery watch, but barely charging it once a week is good enough for me.When it comes to the touch screen, it surely is a nice to have feature, but it is not, by any stretch of the imagination, the best touch screen experience in any watch, let alone in any sports watch. The touch screen is disabled while doing sports, something I don't really mind. When it comes to everyday use, there is no back button gesture, which means you will have to rely on the physical button to do that, and that may be a small inconvenience to some. When you start interacting with the touch screen, there is a delay on the initial touch to the screen, which is slower to respond, and after the first interaction the consecutive interactions have a decent response time - for a sports watch - once you learn you need to tap and hold the screen for a fraction of a second with your first gesture and then proceed as normal, the touch is very usable, however, I can see that simple action can become very annoying for some people, and forgetting about it surely may turn the 'annoying' into a 'frustrating' experience. You get used to it after using it for a while; that being said, it should the watch the one to accommodate to the user needs, not the other way around.Nowadays for the original price, I think it's too expensive since the technology has advanced quite a bit, and it is missing features that have become normal in the industry, however, if you can get it under $450 I think even nowadays it is a good deal, I got mine for $430, but I've seen it even cheaper during some deals even here at Amazon. It is a good watch, and I am hoping to keep using it for the years to come.